Interpreting actions by attributing compositional desires
نویسندگان
چکیده
We cannot see others’ mental states, so we infer them by watching how people behave. Bayesian inference in a model of rational action – called inverse planning – captures how humans infer desires from observable actions. These models represent desires as simple associations between agents and world states. In this paper we show that by representing desires as probabilistic programs, an inverse planning model can infer complex desires underlying complex behaviors—desires with temporal and logical structure, which can be fulfilled in different ways. Our model, which combines basic desires via logical primitives, is inspired by recent probabilistic grammarbased models of concept learning. Through an experiment where we vary behaviors parametrically, we show that our model predicts with high accuracy how people infer complex desires. Our work sheds light on the representations underlying mental states, and paves the way towards algorithms that can reason about others’ minds as we do.
منابع مشابه
Alignment-Based Compositional Semantics for Instruction Following
This paper describes an alignment-based model for interpreting natural language instructions in context. We approach instruction following as a search over plans, scoring sequences of actions conditioned on structured observations of text and the environment. By explicitly modeling both the low-level compositional structure of individual actions and the high-level structure of full plans, we ar...
متن کاملIntentional Systems Theory
Intentional systems theory is in the first place an analysis of the meanings of such everyday 'mentalistic' terms as 'believe,' 'desire,' 'expect,' 'decide,' and 'intend,' the terms of 'folk psychology' (Dennett 1971) that we use to interpret, explain, and predict the behavior of other human beings, animals, some artifacts such as robots and computers, and indeed ourselves. In traditional parla...
متن کاملThree-Year-Olds' Understanding of Desire Reports Is Robust to Conflict
In this paper, we present two experiments with 3-year-olds, exploring their interpretation of sentences about desires. A mature concept of desire entails that desires may conflict with reality and that different people may have conflicting desires. While previous literature is suggestive, it remains unclear whether young children understand that (a) agents can have counterfactual desires about ...
متن کاملTeleological and referential understanding of action in infancy.
There are two fundamentally different ways to attribute intentional mental states to others upon observing their actions. Actions can be interpreted as goal-directed, which warrants ascribing intentions, desires and beliefs appropriate to the observed actions, to the agents. Recent studies suggest that young infants also tend to interpret certain actions in terms of goals, and their reasoning a...
متن کاملAttributing Mental Attitudes to Groups Cooperation in a Qualitative Game Theory
We discuss a general model of cooperation among autonomous agents, based on a qualitative game theory. The basic elements of the model are the ability of agents to recursively model what their partners are expected to do, and the idea that a group can be described as an agent to which goals and desires are attributed: they represent the shared objective and the wish to reduce the costs for the ...
متن کامل